« July 2006 | Main | September 2006 »

August 24, 2006

Open Stage

Moving day is Saturday and the family and I are already encountering obstacles a-plenty. At this point I don't know when I'll have internet access set up at the new digs, so expect at least a week, possibly a little more, of downtime here at Deconsumption.

Consider this an open thread as well as a place to post and comment on anything you deem newsworthy or interesting. And feel free to visit one of the sites on my blogroll as well!

And Thank You for your patience and understanding!

Steven Lagavulin, Proprietor

August 22, 2006

Telegraph: Israel is 'preparing for more fighting'

Full article here.

"Any chance of long-term peace between Lebanon and Israel all but vanished last night after Amir Peretz, the Israeli defence minister, said his country was preparing for another round of fighting.

Mr Peretz spoke only hours after Israeli commandos mounted a raid deep inside Lebanon. Kofi Annan, the United Nations secretary general, said it was a violation of the week-old UN ceasefire....With Israeli reservists returning from south Lebanon with stories of incompetence by commanders, public opinion is hardening against Ehud Olmert, the prime minister."

Now certainly most of us would say we saw this coming a mile away, but what concerns me now is this little bit of deductive reasoning:

1) Widespread acceptance that Hezbollah won the first round by moral victory, and

2) Israeli public outcry making it clear that they approve of quick, decisive warfare but not long, difficult, messy battles of attrition,

3) Israeli leaders had continually dismissed any talk of cease-fire, but then did an about-face and accepted it when it had become clear there was little more headway to be made in the present way they were handling things,

4) At which point they readily agreed to a complete troop withdrawal and hand-over to the UN,

=(?)

5) What Israeli leaders are "preparing for" now is bound to be something completely different than what we just saw...


Of course it would be idiocy to do anything drastic that might put the UN peacekeeping forces in jeopardy...so as long as they remain in place I'm sure nothing scary is going to happen.

Oh, and in related news, Italy--which leads the UN peacekeeping force in Lebanon--has threatened to withdraw if Israel "keeps shooting".

August 18, 2006

Happy Trails!

This is my last day at the corporate grind, before I move on to...who knows what? Perhaps just another corporate grind. So know that for the next two or three weeks at least I'll be pretty distracted with moving, and I'll also be losing internet connection for at least some period of time. So please...bear with me and realize that posting is going to be very hit-or-miss for a while longer yet. What I'll try to do for the time being is to bring the most interesting news items I come across over here on the front page, just to keep things lively...

And speaking of news, I've been spending time reading a couple small-town Wisconsin newspapers online, just to get a feel for the area we're moving to. And while I'm really impressed by how active the "comment community" is for the articles they run, what floors me is the absolute degree of polarized vehemence which surrounds any discussion of politics. It's clear that even in our rural communities, "politics" is no longer something we jovially debate--it has become a slicing civil division.

For instance, to my own mind it seems like those who oppose the present NeoCon administration do so because they fear the NeoCons want to destroy America. But those who support them do so because they steadfastly believe that foreigners (Arabs and Persians) want to destroy America.

So how is it we can share the exact same concerns, and yet instead of coming together to find mutual solutions we've somehow let the media convince us that we should be lashing out against each other instead? And is there any hope or possibility at all that we might be able to come together in our goals (if not in our thinking)...to be able to say "Yes pardner, your tree-huggin' hippie-freak way of life makes me want to pop you in the mouth with a full can of beer, but know too that I stand ready to defend with both these farmer-tanned arms our common cause to make America beautiful again--both inside and out!"

Which is actually the question being posed by this recent Paul Craig Roberts piece, only instead of politics he's talking about the angry schism which surrounds 9/11. In case your wondering Paul Craig Roberts has more credentials than probably anyone who's openly discussed our government's role in 9/11. But of course the corporate media isn't about to interview anyone with real legitimacy (they'd rather smear associate professors at liberal mid-Western colleges), so Roberts reached out to the internet to publish the above piece. And it's probably the most straightforward and concise statement about the 9/11 truth movement I've ever read. In fact it's probably even worthwhile to save the link in your bookmarks, so that the next time you run across some knee-jerk 9/11-skeptic you can just toss this in front of them and say "can you read this and still claim you've got the story behind that fateful day all sewn-up?"

And here I might mention that I just found out today that another individual who's been a cornerstone for intelligent and responsible investigation into 9/11 doesn't seem to hold the same hope that Roberts does. Michael Ruppert (www.fromthewilderness.com) posted his farewell address to the U.S. of A. on Wednesday:

"My country is dead. Its people have surrendered to tyranny, and in so doing, they have become tyranny’s primary support group; its base constituency; its chief defender. Every day they offer their endorsement of tyranny by banking in its banks and spending their borrowed money with the corporations that run it. The great Neocon strategy of George H.W. Bush has triumphed. Convince the American people that they can’t live without the “good things”, then sit back and watch as they endorse the progressively more outrageous crimes you commit as you throw them bones with ever-less meat on them. All the while, lock them into debt. Destroy the middle class, the only political base that need be feared. Make them accept, because of their own shared guilt, ever-more repressive police state measures. Do whatever you want."

Whatever your own feelings about Ruppert might be, I'd simply point out that he's not the only dissenter to flee the scene. With every passing year more and more people seem to be heeding the signs and lessons of events in our world, and myself hopefully included. Looking only here in weblog-world I've watched several people pack their bags and hitch it out of town during the past few years. And these are intelligent, level-headed people, not reactionaries or neurotic-types.

Because certainly it's one thing when someone throws up their hands and says "Oh my God the election was stolen! That's it, I'm moving to Canada!" But it's quite another case when you begin to realize that a bellweather movement is underway by an ever-growing number of people--people who've been watching events passing from year to year, all the while quietly making their preparations to flee the ship as they're able. And they're leaving because they recognize that the direction we're headed is only becoming more defined and more disconcerting over time, not less so, and that in fact nobody seems to have a Plan B for reversing this course of events. Even that stalwart Peak Oil apologist Matt Simmons has apparently finally thrown in the towel and admitted we can't change the system from the inside.

So for myself? The plan as it stands now is to rent for a year or so, give the housing market and the economy more time to pursue their inevitable course without taking all my equity down with it, and to test the waters as to whether it's possible for a outsider to show-up in a small American town and try to act as a catalyst in helping people there organize themselves toward some semblance of preparation for the coming culture shock. And even if that's not possible, I'm still confident that I've at least chosen an area to settle in which is already as well-prepared as any. Not to mention that if our country somehow miraculously rallies to it's own cause and pulls down all the corporations and political leaders and replaces them with a system that makes leadership a painful obligation for those with real ability rather than a reward for those with limited conscience...well, I'll still be happy with the choice I've made because I'll be living in a healthy, vibrant community that I'd want to be living in anyway.

I think that's the secret to life, relationships, and chess: to try to arrange things so that all the most reasonable outcomes which might flow from your decisions will ultimately be happy ones.

Interestingly enough (to me) is that while I was cleaning out my desk at work today I found a sketchy outline of my original plan for this here Deconsumption site. Instead of the tag-line "The Party's Over, Turn Out the Lights" I had evidently initially penned "Awakening from the American Dream". I don't know why I didn't go with that...perhaps it seemed un-patriotic or something. But I think it was a better tag-line really...

August 13, 2006

Stranger Than Fiction

Bush has headed off on his 10-day vacation to his home in Crawford, TX, during which time the press often likes to ask "so what is the President reading?" It's generally presumed that it'll be somehow enlightening to know which books are most strongly calling to our Commander in Chief's attention during these rare moments of personal time. The traditional answers given are a well-scripted list of titles regarding the lives of great past-Presidents, the lessons of ancient history and diplomacy, and with often a nod or two to something of more popular contemporary relevance.

Bush reads Camus's 'The Stranger' on ranch vacation

"US President George W. Bush quoted French existential writer Albert Camus to European leaders a year and a half ago, and now he's read one of his most famous works: "The Stranger."

White House spokesman Tony Snow said Friday that Bush, here on his Texas ranch enjoying a 10-day vacation from Washington, had made quick work of the Algerian-born writer's 1946 novel..."

Alright. So does anyone else find the possibility that Camus might be one of Bush's favorite writers deeply, deeply alarming?

Now if this is just an ill-conceived feint toward literary erudition, then the best we might say is...well, that it's very ill-conceived. But the hint from this little press blurb is that Bush likes Camus, that he wanted to read The Stranger before all other books, that he's stimulated by and appreciates what Camus has to offer him during rare moments when he can be truly alone with himself. That leads me to believe he feels a genuine identification with Camus' classic tale...

The Stranger, if you haven't read it, is about a man who kills an Arab. But to be a little more precise, he kills an Arab for no reason. Absolutely no reason at all. Indeed that's the whole point of Camus' story. The protaganist--a rather formless individual by the name of Meursault--has become so completely disconnected from any sensation of reality that he is literally drawn as sleepwalking through his days. While others pretend and pantomime to having heartfelt feelings and relationships, the "truth" through Meursault's eyes is that he's little more than the shell of a human being "going through the motions" of living.

Ultimately the grindingly oppressive and detached atmosphere Camus draws-out for us leads Meursault with a calm fatalism to the moment where he shoots the nameless Arab. But don't let my own third-rate critical analysis mislead you; let me turn instead to the popular GradeSaver.com, which provides free online study guides for popular literary works, all written and edited by Harvard University students:

"[Meursault] is as removed from reality and social context at this moment as every moment. He squeezes the trigger without intent. Each small act is singular. He realizes that he has shattered his happy harmonious life -- so why fire four more times? What kind of monster can this be? He will later stress to the reader that he is really like everyone else. What does this say about man and our struggle in the world? Is there another solution to living than blame or indifference? The shots are the peak of Meursault's physical life. In order to transcend this blurred dazed drunkenness he consumes, he must knock "on the door of unhappiness."

So I'll put the question again...what does it mean to you that "The Decider"--a leader residing at the fulcrum of an era seemingly defined by incessant crisis and catastrophe--should "make quick work" of The Stranger on his first days of vacation? I mean is it just me? Am I simply being a literary bigot? Conjuring up a tempest in a teapot? Or am I justified in having a dark foreboding that perhaps this doesn't speak well to our President's maintaining the mental fortitude needed to determine the beneficent course of world events?

"Sir can you tell us what the President is reading during his vacation?

Of course Jim. I noted Mr. President thumbing through a small selection of books on the drive to the ranch...Goodwin's new whopper on the political genius of Abraham Lincoln, Kissenger's "Diplomacy" of course...and as the President has long been a fan of poetry I noticed he was most eagerly devouring "The Bell Jar" by Sylvia Plath..."

If it is indeed true that Bush turns straight to Camus for solace during his down-time, then for myself I can only heed it as a warning sign. I don't say this as a political statement or criticism--I take every opportunity to remind readers that I've never felt it's prudent to identify oneself with any particular political party. Rather I see this as a distinctly personal concern, because it may well signal that there's danger at the helm. It might even be a cry for help.

The existentialist writers like Camus and Sartre, for all their expressive talents, were really only an anomaly on the philosophic scene. They came out of a Europe that had directly perceived the frailty of human civilization, a shattered realization that "Armageddon" wasn't merely a figure of speech. On both a spiritual and intellectual level these people wrestled with devils using pen and paper as weapons, striving to make sense of the psychically humiliating possibility that individual life might very well be devoid of any purpose or meaning. And The Stranger, let's suffice it to say, wasn't a particularly glorious battle in that war.

So for a grown man in a position of inestimable daily stress, a man who must recognize underneath it all that he was born on third-base never having hit a triple, a young man whose family life was less than nurturing, and whose lifelong struggle with alcoholism and drug abuse is common knowledge...it would only be prudent to take this as a sign.

Certainly a lot could be made of the opening scenes in The Stranger, which show the protaganist dozing-off repeatedly at his mother's funeral, unable to recall even on what day she had died--and seeing as we're talking about G. W. Bush here a lot could be made of it. But it's those final closing passages that leap to my mind right now:

"For the first time, in that night alive with signs and stars, I opened myself to the gentle indifference of the world...For everything to be consummated, for me to feel less alone, I had only to wish that there be a large crowd of spectators the day of my execution and that they greet me with cries of hate."

"Thereupon G. W. slowly, almost lingeringly, closed the book and stared toward the window and out at the night sky. "...to feel less alone, I had only to wish that...they greet me with cries of hate." Before long however this pensive mood was captured by the gentle chirping of Texas crickets on the lawn outside the ranch..."

Of course there's also a third theory we should probably entertain as well. It's rather far-fetched to be sure--and I'm bringing it up only for the sake of completeness. Only because...well, we're dealing with NeoCons here after all....

Perhaps the President's reported reading material was not simply a bungled PR bullet-point.

And perhaps it was in fact a signal--but not actually an indicator of his personal mental state.

Perhaps Camus' The Stranger was intended to be a kind of sick joke. A subtle message if you will--to those who follow these types of things--that the plan is still in place and that it's still proceding more or less according to schedule. A publicly expressed wink-and-a-nod to the counter-counter-intelligences of the world. A brief but sharply whispered "We know that you know...and we want you to know that we know that you know". You know?

But I'm not saying that that's it at all. Indeed, like Camus' Meursault himself, I sometimes feel that I'm at a loss to know what is real about anything this administration says or does anymore. I'm just saying that sometimes real-life can seem much stranger to our senses than even the most classic literary works of fiction.

August 11, 2006

Fun 'n' Games Friday!


Where in the World is Ken Lay?

August 10, 2006

NightStar Flashlight Sale!

I noticed the NightStar flashlight manufacturer is offering a clearance sale direct on their website. So if you've been thinking lately that it might be prudent to own a completely self-reliant light source, or were just looking for an excuse to buy a second one, perhaps this is the right time....

NightStar Magnetic Force FlashlightNightStar Magnetic Force Flashlight

Porno for Eco's

Inhabitat hints that perhaps insulation isn't all that sexy a topic, but then launches into a thoroughly hot, sweaty and unadulterated overview of why you really, really want to get up close and personal with that R-value you put into your home. Growrrrr, Baby!

(evidently the page is half-missing at the moment, so check back again when they have it fixed).

"The Fragility of Global Trade and Infrastructure" by Alice Friedemann

I just finished this great piece called "The fragility of global trade and infrastructure" by Alice Friedemann, and which is posted over at Energy Bulletin. It essentially takes on the argument that outsourcing and "just in time" delivery practices, which have in recent years served to keep modern corporations afloat, will ultimately (and perhaps sooner than later) prove their demise. And if you're a regular reader of Urban Survival you'll know this is one of George Ure's pet theories as well.

But Friedemann's piece if far from being a dry read, and ranges through a vast number of fascinating facts, evocative evidence and perceptive perspectives in making her point. So it gets my recommendation for those you dig this kind of thing. Tough to find the best representative quote, but this one sounded good:

"There are almost 120 boys for each 100 girls being born in China, due to the one-child policy leading parents to prefer boys to girls. Historically, this skewed ratio has meant big trouble, and one of the ways societies coped was by starting wars.

Women are being kidnapped and sold as brides. From 2001 to 2003 China's police freed more than 42,000 kidnapped women and children. And it's only likely to get worse; one estimate puts the number of bachelors over the next decade at 40 million."

(Actually, I wrote about China's one-child problems briefly back in April of 2004 in a post entitled A Nation of Only Children. It wasn't a great piece but it made a great point: that the world may not necessarily benefit from a growing new super-power with a preponderance of only children).

Did You Come Here Looking for My Opinion on the Bomb Plot?

Well something may or may not have threatened air travel today.

Those who wish to believe the story appear eager to believe it. Those who do not wish to believe the story appear doubtful and won't readily believe it. Net result is that it would seem that it's impossible to know anymore what to believe.

Oh, and by the way...30% of Americans polled don't even know in what year the 9/11 attacks occurred.

The system is broke.

August 09, 2006

Thanks Faux the Memories

I've been attempting to cover the Reuter's "faux-tographer" story over at the News Room but I thought I'd pull it over here onto the front page because--as they say in the journalistic biz--"this story's gettin' legs!"

In a turn of events that pretty much everybody saw coming it appears that this was not the isolated event that media CEO's would have had us believe. In fact at this point it's safe to say that if it's a photo and it came out of Lebanon in the past few months then somebody is going over it right now with a fine-toothed comb. And the webloggers are digging up some real gems. This site is just one of many, but it gives a pretty good run-down of what's being unearthed (the staged shots are the most interesting).

"As can be gleaned from the examples above, Reuters is not the only news service involved in some of these bogus photo reports coming out of Lebanon. Photographers from Associated Press and Agence France Presse, in particular, have been present at some of the staged scenes as well, and AP's captions have repeatedly drawn criticism from several bloggers. Now the New York Times enters the fray, with a transparent hoax being featured prominently on its site."

Evidently being a fauxtographer in the Middle-East involves rolling out of bed about half-past noon, staging a roll or two of pics, then high-tailing it back to the safety of the hotel for a little Photoshop and a lot a cocktails...

What's strange to me though is how it seems that because the story was broken on the xenophobic website Little Green Footballs, most of the right-wing blogosphere seem to think they've broken open some kind of grand liberal-media conspiracy or something. They don't seem to get that this is a systemic problem--just one of many cracks in a corporate system grown exceedingly top-heavy. After all, it's obviously not just photographers--they're only the newest chapter after the long string of faux-journalists that have been outed in the past couple years. And it's not just "the Lebanon gig", either, if you ask me. If the webloggers keep looking far enough, I'm sure they'll find fake pics from foreign assignments all over the world, and extending back almost as far as photo-editing software itself.

Because let's face it, whether you're an unpaid blogger or a salaried journalist, at the end of the day it's all about just giving the client what they want...and what they want are stories and photos with just a little extra "umph!". And we should also note that this is also without doubt a sympton of our modern craving for "instantaneous newsfeeds". It must make it all but impossible to do the kind of rigorous fact-checking that the MSM is supposed to protect us with.

In fact a nice amateur video-report on this site cites how the recent fauxtographry debacle really only adds to a string of MSM intentional fact-spinning, and goes on to proclaims that the Blogosphere may have officially put the nail in the coffin of MSM legitmacy. And perhaps that's so, and perhaps not. But what is becoming more and more clear is that line between "professional" and "amateur" has become exceedingly thin and grey.

Deconsumption Product Cata'blog

Resources for Deconsumers

Blog powered by TypePad

Babel Fish

Email

  • Email: lagavulin142857 [ @ sign ] lycos.com