« April 2006 | Main | June 2006 »

May 30, 2006

The End of an Easy-Money Era

Just over a couple months ago the Bank of Japan made a simple yet historic announcement: that they were prepared to begin raising their interest rates shortly, perhaps as early as next month. Now admittedly on the face of it such an announcement wouldn’t appear all that groundbreaking—Central Banks the world over change their rates all the time, albeit rarely with such forewarning. But in Japan’s case the decision marks a pivotal moment in our modern financial history.

Japan is the world’s second-largest economy, and Japanese short-term rates had been hovering near 0% for almost six years. These two factors—high liquidity in combination with miniscule borrowing costs—have formed the backbone for a modern economic miracle known as the yen carry trade. But now with Japan preparing for the prospect of raising rates, the miracle is beginning to unravel…and it’s already started wreaking havoc with global markets.

The yen carry trade is a pretty sweet deal by which speculators could borrow money from Japan at well under 1% interest and then turn around and use the funds to purchase bonds or assets elsewhere, pocketing the difference as profit. This ultra-easy money policy was intended to spur Japanese bank investment and bring Japan out of a depression, but that didn’t really happen. Instead the money was used to finance global speculation. And because this “free money” was being distributed in seemingly limitless amounts by a sound industrial nation with deep pockets and a stable currency and rate history, the deal proved too good to pass up for major investment houses, banks, mutual funds, insurance groups, pension funds and hedge funds the world over.

The actual numbers are unfathomable, but we know the BOJ was injecting some $300 billion a day into the system (Zhejiang Online, April 20th), which was about $250 billion over their own stated “required level” of current account deposits. This means the banks were continually hard-pressed to find other uses for 5 or 6 times the money they actually needed, and that excess liquidity went anywhere and everywhere there was a profit to be had. The yen carry trade has bolstered U.S. Treasuries certainly in recent years, but in a highly competitive financial world a few percentage points in risk-free profit is never enough. Thus these funds quickly began to feed more speculative bond, currency, derivative and stock markets. They’ve even provided significant hot-air to inflate the worldwide housing bubble.

But now (to mix metaphors) the gushing spigot is being shut-off as the BOJ ceases rolling over most of their short-term debt. All told, perhaps some $2.5 trillion will gradually have to be repatriated as the longer loans come due (International Forecaster, April 2006). The BOJ is under definite pressure to go slow and to keep the liquidity flowing as long as possible, but a recent Nikkei Financial Daily opinion piece stated the liquidity draining is actually happening quite a bit faster than expected, and hinted therefore that the first rate rise could come in June (Bloomberg, May 9th). This indicates the BOJ may be more anxious to tighten things up than market players would like.

In a world already buckling under financial strain and suffering from high crude oil prices, with rising interest rates in advanced economies, global current-account imbalances, and with the U.S. Dollar seemingly under attack by policies both within and without its borders, the end of the yen carry trade party is bound to bring an unpleasant hangover.

You may have seen a passing blurb in the American media last Monday, although you had to go out of your way to find it: equity markets all over the world opened the week in crash mode. India, Brazil, Argentina, Mexico, Indonesia, Singapore, Austria, Norway, Sweden, Belgium, Egypt, Italy, to name just a few…all were down anywhere from 3% to 8% on Monday alone. Strangely, if the situation received any attention at all in most papers it was described as being somehow tied to U.S. inflation concerns, although in the U.S. bond prices were barely moving. No real attention seemed to be given to the actual cause of this panic: these were all small-cap speculative markets that had been driven-up in recent years by money coming out of Japan and looking for someplace to go. As of this writing most of these markets have stabilized. Some have even rebounded. But recent history suggests the worst may be far from over because Monday’s action wasn’t by any means the beginning of financial troubles for the emerging and illiquid global markets.

The first warning shot was actually signaled more immediately back in March. Just a couple weeks after the BOJ’s initial announcement that they were putting the kibosh on the easy money trade, Iceland’s stock market plunged almost 20% in one day. While nominally triggered by a Fitch-rating downgrade of its credit-worthiness, the violence of the reaction was most certainly exacerbated by investor skittishness in anticipation of the unwinding of the carry trade. And a short chain-reaction ensued in other emerging economies, roiling markets in Poland, Hungary, Brazil and New Zealand…leading many commentators to draw comparison with the Asian Contagion currency crisis of 1997.

The effects are not limited to equities. As it stands now the Icelandic krona—already falling before the Fitch downgrade—has lost about 12% of its value against the dollar this year. The NZ Dollar as well has fallen about 15%, plunging almost 10% in the month of March alone. Combine these early aches and pains with Monday’s sneezes and it would seem this new Contagion is still in its early stages yet. Ultimately we should expect colds in foreign exchanges, bond markets, interest rates and derivatives markets everywhere. The Economist agreed back in December that “investors have good reason to fear the Bank of Japan”, especially in an era where consumers, governments and corporations are “leveraged to the gills”.

The unwinding of the yen carry trade doesn’t necessarily have to spell doomsday, but it is certain to suck the wind out of emerging markets and derivatives trading. And then again, our contemporary world is like a tired juggler with too many plates in the air—so any misstep at this juncture is bound to get very messy very quickly. It’s not the rate rise that threatens—certainly rates are heading up the world over, perhaps faster than those Japan would pursue—rather, it’s the loss of liquidity. And it’s unlikely the Fed will be able to pick-up the slack this time in the same way as it was able to paper-over the Asian Contagion of 1997 (and the collapse of mega-hedge-fund LTCM that followed in its wake). The Fed’s presses are already running white-hot, a fact which is finally starting to draw fearful alarms from the crowd. That means there is scant cushion available for any of the major players who might be adversely affected.

With the closing of the yen carry trade era an important support to the U.S. and global economies is being removed. And at this stage in history it’s anyone guess how far down the floor lies.


[UPDATE: No sooner do I get this analysis up than I learn the Bank of Japan is flooding the system with Yen in an effort to ward off a crash.

"The Bank of Japan pumped a record 1.5 trillion yen into the money market Monday in an effort to curb the sharp increase in unsecured overnight call rates, according to a report in the Tuesday edition of the Nikkei Financial Daily.

The bank announced in the afternoon its planned funds-supplying operations from Tuesday onward, designed to calm the market. "It has recently lost some of its composure," the Nikkei quoted a BOJ official as saying."

So perhaps the crisis has been averted....for now, at any rate (hey, that's a pun!)]

Australian Newspaper Advocates Following Sweden's Lead

Normally I keep "news" over in the News Room, but this piece just floors me. I didn't expect this kind of talk to surface so quickly, although I suppose I should have. It was only a few months ago that Peak Oil was beginning to gingerly surface in the MSM...now I can't even keep up with the slew of major admissions that we're at the Peak. But still, I didn't expect them to actually start advocating practical policy solutions so quickly. Because those actually affect big corporation's pocketbooks. I figured the people in charge would just spend the next few years saying "hey all you little people, try to turn out your lights when you're not using them and don't drive if you could walk". Then go on funding GM and Ford with public money to research better engines that get better milage...

But this Australian paper is actually suggesting that state and local governments should stop investing in oil-based infrastructure and begin embracing the ways of a new culture of deconsumption and conservation.

In other words, they're actually saying that it's time to begin working against the long history governments have of being in bed with the Oil and Auto industries.

From the Business section of daily newspaper The Age out of Melbourne Australia:

Low Oil Warning: Planning Starts Now, by Elliot Fishman

"Whichever camp you belong to, planning for a low oil future begins now. We have never consumed as much oil globally as we do today.

Indeed, our appetite is growing, but geological constraints will put an end to it....In an effort to partially insulate ourselves from volatile oil prices, governments must begin planning now....It will take decades to wean ourselves off oil.

In time, nature will do this for us, but it will be significantly less painful if we take some pre-emptive steps; an adaptation involving significant change in our society and its infrastructure.

Car-dependent suburbs will become unviable and public transport networks will require rapid expansion.

The current urban arrangement, where low-income communities are located in transport-poor outer suburbs, is unsustainable.

...[G]overnments must begin the process of adapting to high fuel costs by placing a moratorium on new urban roads. It is simply irresponsible to spend billions on infrastructure that will be of limited use in an oil-scarce future. Fringe benefits tax and salary packaging arrangements that promote greater car use must be eliminated. The 4WD import duty concession should be removed. These are just a few of the perverse subsidies that encourage oil consumption in an era requiring conservation.

Last week the Federal Government demonstrated its inability to plan for the coming oil crisis by announcing a $52 million subsidy to Ford to produce internal combustion engine cars in Victoria. The Victorian Government is expected to match this. All this comes while the Senate Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport Committee conducts its inquiry into Australia's future oil supply and alternative transport fuels.

Despite being flooded with submissions from experts outlining the serious limitations to our oil supply, the Government acts as though supplies are cheap and plentiful.

Nothing could be further from the truth. Earlier this year, Sweden announced it was formally beginning the process of eliminating oil from its economy. All levels of our government must begin the transition to a low oil future, including a massive boost to walking, cycling and public transport infrastructure — the most appropriate transport in an oil-scarce future. The earlier we begin the transition, the less painful it will be."


[UPDATE 6/01/2006: Author Elliot Fishman alerted me to his organization's website, the Institute for Sensible Transport, which is dedicated to helping urban areas reduce car use and encourage healthier, less egoistic forms of transportation.]

May 28, 2006

Cannes Applauds "America: Freedom to Fascism"

Because nothing in America is real until we see it on the Big Screen, this might be how the revolution will be televised. I referenced "America: Freedom to Fascism" at the News Room a while back, but it looks like it might rise above being just another "critical independent documentary":

"Aaron Russo’s incendiary political documentary which exposes many of the governmental organizations and entities that have abridged the freedoms of U.S. citizens had its international premiere at Cannes and won a standing ovation. The event, which was held on the beach and filled to capacity, was open to the public and drew a crowd of people who stood along the boardwalk to watch the film."

If you show your film for free on a beach, is that really the same as "premiering it at Cannes"? I guess it is. Actually, now that I think about it...I bet only the hottest flicks get to have a showing on the beachfront...

"Neither left nor right-wing in perspective, the film concludes that the U.S. government is taking on the characteristics of a police state."

No comment.

"Russo, who is best known as the producer of feature films including “The Rose” with Bette Midler and “Trading Places” with Eddie Murphy and Dan Aykroyd, wrote, produced, and directed the doc. “I am disgusted by the direction America was heading,” says Russo. “I made this movie because I want to live in a free country and I want my kids and grandkids to live in a free country. The American people must abandon the myth that America is still the land of liberty that it once was.”

Russo’s doc already has a tremendous grass root groundswell behind it. The film has previewed in over twenty-five cities with sold out theatres and standing ovations. The website, www.freedomtofascism.com has been had[sic] over five hundred thousand (500,000) streams of the video trailer."


[credit Urbansuvival.com]

May 26, 2006

The Times They Are A-Changing...

On a beautiful summer holiday weekend I have to give props to a recent piece in which Phila at Bouphonia calls bullshit on Gregg Easterbrook over at the NY Times. I take notice when a gentlemanly writer like Phila says "Gregg Easterbrook is a Liar and a Fraud".

Easterbrook's "I'm now switching sides regarding global warming" piece has gotten a bit of play in legitimate eco-circles, but that should only remind us that it's crucial in this precarious age of psy-ops-cum-media to stay ever vigilant of the turncoats at the gate.

"Gregg Easterbrook wants us to know that it is now officially "reasonable" to be concerned about climate change.

Does this mean that people who previously denied climate change were not reasonable? Of course not! It doesn't work that way. The center-right position is synonymous with reason; as such, it can grant validity to other positions, but can't be invalidated itself."

Exactamundo. For my money this shows why Phila is--along with Ran Prieur and Jeff Wells--one of the webloggers who best represents the positive pole of the Gen-X revolution....possessing the intellect and character to convincingly say to the Boomer-Fascists of Corporatonia: "You know what, dude? I don't even buy into the preconceptual framework of your arguments anymore...".

Except of course they're not really saying it to them. They're addressing their own ranks.


[This piece presented with all due apologies to the venerable Boomer-Socialists of Humania]

May 24, 2006

"The Dollar's Evil Twin" by Jane Stillwater

Matt at LATOC linked to this piece today, but it's so good it deserves all the linkage it can get.

The dollar's evil twin: Exploring the Bush bureaucracy's private monetary system
by Jane Stillwater

"Still deep in thought, I walked over to the park's Little Farm and looked at the chickens, pigs, rabbits and cows. "No one is gonna believe this," I told a chicken that had just pecked at my shoe. "They are all gonna just think that I'm paranoid. But seriously, look at the evidence. . . ." The chicken looked.

"The American economy is in deep trouble but it hasn't crashed. That's against every law of economics since Adam Smith! The feds SHOULD be bankrupt. Yet they are not." The chicken nodded its head.

"There must be money pouring into the system from somewhere." The chicken agreed.

"But where?"


May 22, 2006

Timely Tidbits...

World markets crashing today. You might swing by Yahoo! Finance or CNN Money and gawk at the carnage... a list of markets down more than 3.5% at the moment: India, Brazil (-6%!), Argentina, Mexico, Indonesia (-6%!), Singapore, Austria (-7.5%!), Norway, Sweden (-5.5%), Belgium, Egypt (-5+%), Italy...

And speaking of indexes, I thought it might be a good time to check back in with the price of water--or rather a rough proxy for it in the demand for shares of companies in the newly emerging "Water Industry". How newly emerging? Well the most comprehensive index is called the Palisades Water Index, which was inaugurated on the Amex. just over 2 years ago. Check out the PR statement:

"The Palisades Water Index is the premier vehicle developed for investors to capture the potential associated with the substantial increase in the economic value of water. We believe that this value will inevitably be unlocked as the global population adjusts to the linkages between human health, economic development and resource sustainability."

Is that last statement a chilling double entendre or what?

Water_index_2

Anyway, as things stand now the wild bull-market in water appears to be taking a header with all the other Industrials. [Click Image for Bigness] But this likely only affects the inflated market-cap of the underlying stocks, and not the actual price on your utility bill. Water is still looking like the next oil, and the world's industrialists are climbing all over themselves not only to own it, but to take water handling "technology" ever forward (i.e. filtration, desalinisation, distribution, waste-water treatment and handling, etc.). Which should serve as a reminder to us all that complex systems are very precarious and require large energy-inputs to maintain. Therefore we should all have a Plan B for water, no matter where we live. That's why I've listed some helpful resources in this respect over on the Deconsumption Product Cata'blog.

It occurred to me over the weekend that it's rather interesting that the sudden upsurge in border control also very neatly coincides with the busting of the home-building market--which throughout the nation fundamentally depends on labor from South of the Border.

I mean without taking sides one way or the other in the immigration issue, isn't it worth questioning why it is that for five years after 9-11, when the so-called War on Terrorism™ was in full swing, both of our political parties completely ignored the fact that an estimated 1,000 or so non-resident aliens were illegally crossing the Mexican-American border every day? (Actually, by many accounts from within the Border Patrol there was an active resistance being put-up which prevented them from fullfilling their duties). And now it's such an issue that they're considering walling the border off in places. I'm not saying there has to be a direct correlation, but I bet it hasn't been lost on a lot of lawmakers (especially those in the Southwest) that the nation is going to have a lot of idle (Mexican) hands on its hands pretty soon--and you know the saying about idle hands.

Again, I'm not picking a argument...only pointing out that the globalization of jobs means both exporting jobs and importing cheap labor, and it's very serious business for our nation's lobbying interests. So during the time the housing market was propping-up a failing economy I can see how "immigration" would have been seen as an issue best left ignored. But now that the money has been made.... And besides, what if next year the Hispanic community decides to protest for a week instead of just one day?

And to close on a less controversial subject... Via Urbansurvival.com you may have heard that NBC affiliate Channel 4 News out of Los Angeles will be airing a segment on Chem-trails tomorrow night. Might be interesting if you live in the area. The report is called "Toxic Sky".

May 19, 2006

Peak Food

This article is getting referenced everywhere, and for damn good reason. Please read the whole thing because almost every sentence reveals how important and urgent a message this is for us to heed.

Global Food Supply Near the Breaking Point

Here's a smattering:

"The world is now eating more food than farmers grow, pushing global grain stocks to their lowest level in 30 years....In five of the last six years, global population ate significantly more grains than farmers produced.

There isn't much land left on the planet that can be converted into new food-producing areas, notes Lester Brown, president of the Earth Policy Institute, a Washington-based non-governmental organisation. And what is left is of generally poor quality or likely to turn into dust bowls if heavily exploited, Brown told IPS.

..."Biotechnology has made little difference so far," he said.

Even if the long-promised biotech advances in drought, cold, and disease-resistance come about in the next decade, they will boost yields little more than five percent globally, Brown said.

"There's not nearly enough discussion about how people will be fed 20 years from now," he said.

..."The food production system is designed to generate profits, not produce food or nutrition for people," Qualman told IPS...."It's a system that's perfectly happy to leave hundreds of millions of people unfed," he said.

...Shifting from a global food production system to local food for local people would go a long way towards addressing inequity, Qualman believes.

"The 100-mile diet, where people obtain their food from within a 100-mile radius of their homes, makes good sense for most of the world," he said."

N.Y. Times Buries 9/11 Story

There a great scoop-discussion going on over at Democratic Underground.

Here's the basic theme of it as quoted by DU poster "paulthompson":

"Judith Miller (of all people!) talks about the 9/11 warning story from the summer of 2001 that the New York Times considered putting on the front page but ultimately failed to report on at all. It also involves the NSA, which is interesting given the new CIA Director nominee Michael Hayden was the head of the NSA at the time.

...[Says Miller:] "But I did manage to have a conversation with a source that weekend. The person told me that there was some concern about an intercept that had been picked up. The incident that had gotten everyone's attention was a conversation between two members of Al Qaida. And they had been talking to one another, supposedly expressing disappointment that the United States had not chosen to retaliate more seriously against what had happened to the Cole. And one Al Qaida operative was overheard saying to the other, 'Don't worry; we're planning something so big now that the U.S. will have to respond.'

"And I was obviously floored by that information. I thought it was a very good story: (1) the source was impeccable; (2) the information was specific, tying Al Qaida operatives to, at least, knowledge of the attack on the Cole; and (3) they were warning that something big was coming, to which the United States would have to respond. This struck me as a major page one-potential story."

...[paulthompson:] What's interesting is why didn't she reveal this almost story until now? Obviously, she and the New York Times were protecting the Bush administration's reputation. In fact, the New York Times even went so far as to remove an interesting story about al-Qaeda they'd published on September 9, 2001 immediately after 9/11. Until this day, if you try to access this story through their web archive you are sent to another story by the same article written shortly after 9/11." [more on this in first post of discussion thread - SL]

I have no doubt the Times had a perfectly good reason for burying the story. And then ignoring that they buried it. And let's be honest: as unseemly as it seems, it's really only one more loose thread that might be added to Jeff Wells' chillingly impressive collection of loose threads that lay scattered about the tattered veil which obscures the true events of 9/11.

Oh, and as long as we're picking at lint, here's one more piece you might have seen already:

"Makram Chams owned a Kwik-Check convenience store in Venice, where the biggest overseas money transfer to the terrorists, $70,000 from the UAE., was sent, according to the testimony of FBI agents during the 9.11 Commission hearings.

...Strangely, Chams left town soon after the 9.11 attack, abandoning a thriving convenience store which has stood vacant ever since.

...No one knew where he was, or why he'd left. But now Chams has re-surfaced in Saudi Arabia, where he worked in an unlikely capacity: as a contractor for American defense firm Titan Corp.

...It has since been revealed that Titan trains mercenaries, and provides mercenaries for operations. Current operations. Ongoing operations...

Disclosures in the Duke Cunningham scandal lead directly to Titan. Before it is done, this may present someone with some very thorny problems."

According to this Mad Cow Productions story, Makram Chams' convenience store was frequently visited by Mohammad Atta and other alleged terrorists, and Chams was investigated by the FBI just days after 9/11 so his name must certainly be on any "suspicious" lists that private military contractors would check against before hiring employees in any capacity. He worked as an independent contractor in unnamed capacity for Titan Corp. until he was terminated. He is now engaged in a $22 million lawsuit for wrongful termination of contract. I have trouble imagining what value a former convenience store owner with an FBI file might add for Titan Corp., but whatever it is he is threatening (blackmailing?) to take it into the courts to explain it.

Of course, as mentioned at the beginning of the above article, Titan has also been further implicated "in the fraudulent bankruptcy of a shadowy St. Petersburg FL company which owned the DC9 "Cocaine One" flight busted in Mexico". As Jeff Wells would say, I suppose that's just the troublesome cost of doing business with countries who's governements do not stridently uphold the "rule of law".

May 17, 2006

The Deconsumption Product Cata'blog

You've probably noticed the ad for the Sidewinder Manual Cell-Phone Charger at the right. Over time I've picked up some useful items like the Sidewinder to help with emergency preparedness or living a more sustainable lifestyle and I've been playing around with the idea of offering affiliated links to some of these products. They're usually smaller items that are interesting and somewhat uncommon--like the NightStar flashlight--and not really big-ticket items like a $1200 treadle sewing-machine or an $800 grain mill.

Yet at the same time I've always had a fundamental aversion to posting advertising on Deconsumption -- an aversion which has only been strengthened by looking at the Sidewinder ad on the sidebar.

So I finally decided what I'd do is try spinning-off the product recommendations into a separate page which I have cleverly named the Deconsumption Product Cata'blog. It's now linked over there on the right where the Sidewinder ad used to be.

This way people can visit there if they want to shop or just get ideas, but at the same time it won't detract from the simplicity and austerity of the main homepage here (I call it "simplicity and austerity", you probably call it "webdesign-challenged"...). I mean advertising, after all, is really just attention-pollution when you get down to it.

So instead when I run across items I think are worth recommending I'll just save all the posts over there into an ongoing "online catalog". Except it's on a weblog...so that makes it a Cataweblog! But then you can shorten it--oh, you get the point...

And in full disclaimer, for some of the product links if you click through and then actually buy anything I might get a couple bucks or so as a referral credit--but not all of them. And at the same time most of these direct-to-distributor links (like both of the products listed currently) are actually the cheapest way to buy the items anyway (since there's no middle-man) so it works out for you too.

Anyway, the Cata'blog isn't much at the moment but stop by and give it a look-see if you will...

May 16, 2006

I'm Doing My Inconsequential Part for the Environment

"Why do I boycott multinational oil and gas corporations that fail to acknowledge and address global-warming issues, resulting in a few less dollars in their swollen coffers? Or participate in demonstrations against local wetland destruction that are attended by as many as a dozen people, before the wetland is eventually drained and cleared for a new Wal-Mart anyway? Why make the effort? Because I care. And I want these feelings to manifest themselves in barely measurable ways."

As Stephen Colbert and now The Onion remind us: Satire exists because the truth is sometimes too disheartening to receive with a straight face.

Deconsumption Product Cata'blog

Resources for Deconsumers

Blog powered by TypePad

Babel Fish

Email

  • Email: lagavulin142857 [ @ sign ] lycos.com